|
White Paper
|
| title |
wpTitle |
| authors |
|
| affiliation |
|
| date |
|
| overview |
This detailed White Paper on the state of healthcare services in
the US and potential solutions for the problems identified
is published on the WWW in wiki format.
Comments (and collaboration) from users are encouraged.
The White Paper supports much wider use of information technologies in healthcare and
describes
and promotes the Wellness-Plus Solution™, a model and commercial technology the
authors claim
is capable of supporting significant improvements in the quality of healthcare provision in the USA.
To quote from the White Paper:
"True quality improvement requires an integrated clinical information system with
Diagnostic Aids, Electronic Health Record (EHR), Computer Physician Order Entry (CPOE),
Computerized Practice Guidelines & Clinical Pathways, Plan-of-Care Execution and
Coordination, Biosurveillance & First Responder Assistance, Knowledge Management,
and Business Intelligence tools, all with advanced decision support and
information-sharing capabilities." |
| summary |
"This wiki examines financial policies, clinical practices and health information technologies,
as well as the causes and consequences of low-quality care. ...
Our strategy changes healthcare policies and practices by focusing on health maintenance,
care quality improvement, and the use of new information technologies."
Executive Summary
"Creating a better future requires understanding why things are the way they are, having a
vision of a better tomorrow, and having a strategy for realizing that vision. When it comes to
something as complex as healthcare, making sense of all this is no easy task. This wiki, therefore,
focuses on presenting the main issues in a clear and organized manner to stimulate productive
dialogue about ways to solve the healthcare crisis.
"First, we define the problem: Healthcare expenditures in America continue to escalate out
of control as quality (safety, effectiveness, efficiency, affordability, timeliness, and
availability) suffers. Fiscal strategies have not only failed to curb costs, but may have
actually lowered overall care quality in the process. Cost control tactics have failed to
improve healthcare cost-effectiveness largely because they didn’t focus on making better use
of scientific research and knowledge. This has had, and continues to have, devastating
consequences.
"Second, we examine proposed solutions: Debates now focus on what models should replace the
failed financial strategies of the past. New models being discussed focus on increasing
consumer co-payments and demanding consumers make complex healthcare choices without
adequate knowledge, or else they focus on setting arbitrary and difficult to measure
“quality” goals providers must accomplish for financial rewards. These models may be
useful, but will only succeed if they address a fundamental problem: Healthcare
stakeholders must (a) know the specific treatments and prevention methods best for
each patient and how to deliver that them efficiently and effectively, and (b) use that
knowledge in a way that continually improves care quality.
"Unfortunately, healthcare stakeholders don’t have this essential knowledge primarily because
there has been a lack of widespread collaboration and consistent use of clinical information
systems to help healthcare providers and their patients make better decisions based on the
scientific evidence. It’s ironic that those who deliver healthcare are drowning in oceans of
information, while operating in a knowledge void; and those who pay for and receive the care
don’t have the knowledge they need to make informed decisions about the value of that care.
"Often, the necessary clinical information simply doesn’t exist. But even when good information
is available to support healthcare decisions, it often isn’t being used to improve care
quality because the unaided human mind, no matter how competent, simply cannot focus
on all the necessary details nor possess all the knowledge needed for continually
making the best clinical decisions. Specialization and traditional information technology
do not solve this problem.
"Third, we propose a unique and sensible model to solve our country’s healthcare problems.
Unlike other models, ours is based on the wisdom that sustainable gains in care quality
require a focused commitment on building and using scientific knowledge within a collaborative
healthcare community to improve outcomes and lower costs. This model recommends implementing
patient-centered care in which healthcare stakeholders continually improve the health and
well-being all people by:
- "Collaborating to develop and use evolving knowledge bases (i.e., information storehouses)
of evidence-based practice guidelines and clinical pathways lessons learned, and
educational materials enabling more personalized treatment tailored to the specific
condition and needs of each person
- "Collaborating to develop and use evolving software tools to collect, share, analyze
and discuss comprehensive healthcare data and models for reporting knowledge-building
information and helping handle catastrophic events
- "Using knowledge services to help them establish collaborative learning networks
that enable new knowledge to emerge, develop, and evolve as people share and discuss
their experiences and ideas, and develop evolving practice guidelines and educational
materials."
|
| contact |
Stephen E. Beller
National Health Data Systems, Inc.
130 Hastings Ave.
Croton On Hudson, NY 10520
USA
T: (914) 271-5434 ext. 2
E: sbeller nhds.com |
| links |
|

| acknowledgements |
| Stephen E. Beller, National Health Data Systems, Inc., USA |
| page history |
Entry on OpenClinical: 30 May 2006
Last main update: 30 May 2006 |
|
|