|
National and international standards for health information systems
|

| preamble |
The purpose of using standards in health information systems is to facilitate the
integratation of component parts and support
interoperability, for example, by making data generated in one part of a system
accessible, meaningful and (re-)usable in another where different technology may be in use.
Standard setting is typically a voluntary
activity initiated by special interest groups of experts. External organisations
such as CEN, ISO or ANSI give the final seal of approval and credibility to an emerging standard
and promote (in the USA) or enforce use.
In health informatics, standards development is concentrated
in such areas as data exchange, medical terminologies,
documents, architectures.
Initial entries under this topic include some internationally recognised terminology sets;
standards in the areas of data transfer and clinical decision support,
and document standards to support the representation of interoperable clinical data.
|
| issues |
- Standards designed to achieve similar goals but in different ways can compete.
- Standards mey be required to be implemented in systems already commissioned and in routine use
- Standards adoption in many countries is obligatory but is optional in the USA, for example,
leading to a situation where they can only be recommended for adoption.
|
| references |
Runy LA.
IT standards. Speaking a common language.
Hosp Health Netw. 2004 Feb;78(2):63-8, 2.
[PubMed]
[]
|
"
Health care trails other fields in the application of information technology primarily because it lacks uniform standards and protocols. This month's gatefold looks at various initiatives now under way by the government and within the health care field.
"
|
Coonan KM.
Medical Informatics Standards Applicable to Emergency Department Information Systems: Making Sense of the Jumble
Academic Emergency Medicine Volume 11, Number 11 1198-1205.
[PubMed]
[]
|
"
The adoption of medical informatics standards by emergency department information systems (EDISs) is not universal, despite obvious benefits. Clinicians and administrators looking to obtain an EDIS need to know exactly what the various standards can do for them and how the systems they depend on can be integrated and extended. In addition to the standard methods for systems to communicate (chiefly Health Level 7 [HL7]) and those required for submission of claims (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]-4, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM], and X12N), there are several other available standards that are clinically useful and can greatly improve the ability to access and exchange patient information. Major advances in the Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine have made the patient medical record information standards (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine [SNOMED], Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes [LOINC], RxNorm) easily accessible. Detailed knowledge of the arcana associated with the technical aspects of the standards is not needed (or desired) by clinicians to use standards-based systems. However, some knowledge about the commonly used standards is helpful in choosing an EDIS, interfacing the EDIS with the other hospital information systems, extending or upgrading systems, and adopting decision support technologies.
"
|
|
| standards: global perspectives |
Zhang Y, Xu Y, Shang L, Rao K.
An investigation into health informatics and related standards in China.
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Aug;76(8):614-20.
[PubMed]
[]
|
"
OBJECTIVE: To describe the current status of and future plans for health informatics and related standards in China and analyze the problems raised in the process of standardization for health informatics. METHODS: Data were collected through investigation and interviews, complemented by a comprehensive review of relevant literatures and regulations/law documents about health informatics and related standards in China. RESULTS: Health informatics has been greatly developed in China. Significant resources were committed to construct and improve the health information system. Approximately 35-40% of hospitals have constructed hospital information system. Over 80% of medical organizations above the county/district level, 27% of town level hospitals and all CDC above the county/district level can transmit real-time epidemic situation reporting through public health information system. However, lack of standards became a bottleneck to utilize and improve health informatics. China has adopted some vocabulary, classification, coding standards and message standards. Moreover, several national standardization actions for health informatics have been taken. In the process of standardization, the main barriers consist of financial, technical, cultural and language problems, legal and ethical concerns and others. CONCLUSIONS: Informatics has the potential to play an important role in China's healthcare reform process and standards are the basis for the information sharing and interoperability. Governments and partners of health informatics have realized the importance of standards and taken the initiatives in trying to solve the problem of lacking standards, but much work still needs to be done.
"
|
Kern J, Strnad M, Dezelić D.
[Role of standardization in health care system computerization]
[Article in Croatian]
Acta Med Croatica. 2005;59(3):201-7.
[PubMed]
[]
|
"
Standardization system includes development, publishing and promotion of standards, as well as their use in practice. Products, services and processes in a variety of human activities should be standardized. The goal of standardization is to achieve a high security level, a high quality, usefulness and effectiveness as well as limitation of variability, ensuring compatibility and replacement (of products), and to eliminate technical problems in the international exchange of people, work, products and services. The leading areas/objects of standardization in medical informatics are electronic health record, classification in health care, communication and message exchange as well as data security and protection of the whole health information system. Technical Committee for Standardization in Medical Informatics (TC215) has so far accepted fifteen standards and prestandards. The affiliate HL7 Croatia works on localization of communication standard HL7 and adaptation to the Croatian requirements.
"
|
|
| references: standards and computer-interpretable guidelines |
Biondich PG, Downs SM, Carroll AE, Shiffman RN, McDonald CJ.
Collaboration between the medical informatics community and guideline authors: fostering HIT standard development that matters.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;:36-40.
[PubMed]
[PubMed Central]
|
"
Clinical guideline authors, health information technology (HIT) standards development organizations, and information system implementers all work to improve the processes of healthcare, but have long functioned independently towards realizing these goals. This has led to clinical standards of care that often poorly align with the functional and technical HIT standards developed to realize them.We describe the shortcomings and inefficiencies inherent in this current process and introduce two national initiatives that attempt to unite these communities. The mission of these two initiatives is to create examples of unambiguous, decidable, and executable clinical guidelines which both utilize and inform HIT terminology and logical expression standards. All of the products of this work aim to facilitate enterprise-wide guideline implementation and create a rising tide which lifts all ships.
"
|
|
| links - general |
|
|
|
| links - US initiatives |
|
|
|
| international links |
|
|
|

| acknowledgements |
| |
| page history |
Entry on OpenClinical v0.1 (first set): 24 February 2005 Last main updates: 10 March 2005; 14 September 2005; 18 June 2006. |
|
|